• Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to LinkedIn
FREE CONSULTATION: 1-888-760-6552 | [email protected]
Florida Bar Hearing
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Bar Hearing Info
  • Areas of Concern
  • Admission Rules
  • Bar Application
  • After you Apply
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: Soreide Law Group PLLC

Florida Bar Hearing Defense Lawyer’s Tip of the Month for March 2014

March 26, 2014
Having just returned from the recent hearings before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners in Tampa, I felt that the topic of child support obligations should be the topic of discussion for this month’s post.
Florida Rule 4-8.4(h) prohibits a lawyer from willfully refusing to timely pay a child support obligation. Florida Statute 61.13015 provides the basis for The Florida Bar to suspend a lawyer or deny a professional license for the willful non-payment of child support obligations.  Child support is an issue that I am beginning to see more often before the Board of Bar Examiners at investigative and formal hearings.
If you have delinquent payment obligations and are currently applying to the bar, try to make every effort to make all payments current. Your scorned ex-spouse will most likely also be contacted the Bar’s examiners and this will give them every opportunity to air out your dirty laundry and pour gasoline on the fire, creating all sorts of new issues you will have to defend.
Being a law student is no excuse for not paying your child support. Make arrangements to keep current at all times. If you have an investigative or formal hearing with the Florida Bar, feel free to call for a consultation at no cost to discuss your situation with a Florida Bar Hearing Defense Attorney. Call Soreide Law Group at (888) 760-6552. Our main office is in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Our attorneys travel to all locations throughout Florida to appear before the Board of Bar Examiners.
https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2014-03-26 09:49:202014-03-26 09:49:20Florida Bar Hearing Defense Lawyer’s Tip of the Month for March 2014

Last Minute Check List before Appearing Before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners for an Investigative Hearing

February 4, 2013

Character and fitness hearings before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners are becoming increasingly common. No two hearings are the same, however the Board is going to weigh the new or further evidence you present at the investigative hearing with the elements listed in Florida Bar Admission Rule 3-12 “Determination of Present Character” during all hearings. If you are unrepresented, and the trend over the last several years is to hire representation for this hearing, carefully examine and consider the rules before appearing.

3-12 Determination of Present Character. The board must determine whether the applicant or registrant has provided satisfactory evidence of good moral character. The following factors, among others, will be considered in assigning weight and significance to prior conduct:
(a) age at the time of the conduct;
(b) recency of the conduct;
(c) reliability of the information concerning the conduct;
(d) seriousness of the conduct;
(e) factors underlying the conduct;
(f) cumulative effect of the conduct or information;
(g) evidence of rehabilitation;
(h) positive social contributions since the conduct;
(i) candor in the admissions process; and,
(j) materiality of any omissions or misrepresentations.
Upon reading these elements what documents can you show the Board that will highlight each and every element under 3-12.  Remember it is a weighing test so the Board is already aware of the bad conduct it is now your responsibility to mitigate or outweigh the bad conduct with good conduct as outlined by 3-12.
For a free consultation regarding your upcoming investigative, formal or rehabilitative hearing before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners call (888) 760-6552 to speak to a Florida Bar Defense Lawyer now.
https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2013-02-04 11:17:252013-02-04 11:17:25Last Minute Check List before Appearing Before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners for an Investigative Hearing

Elements of Rehabilitation in a Formal Hearing

December 13, 2012

 If Specifications have been filed by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners and you have to attend a formal hearing before the Board, you may want to consider pleading “rehabilitation” as an affirmative defense. This is the only affirmative defense that must specifically be plead in your Answer, or else that defense is waived and you may not be permitted to put on evidence of rehabilitation at your formal hearing. In considering what to do to effectively establish rehabilitation, Florida Bar Rule 3-13 codifies the “elements of rehabilitation”.

3-13 Elements of Rehabilitation.
 
Any applicant or registrant who affirmatively asserts rehabilitation from prior conduct that adversely reflects on the person’s character and fitness for admission to the bar must produce clear and convincing evidence of rehabilitation including, but not limited to, the following elements:
(a) strict compliance with the specific conditions of any disciplinary, judicial, administrative, or other order, where applicable;
(b) unimpeachable character and moral standing in the community;
(c) good reputation for professional ability, where applicable;
(d) lack of malice and ill feeling toward those who, by duty, were compelled to bring about the disciplinary, judicial, administrative, or other proceeding;
(e) personal assurances, supported by corroborating evidence, of a desire and intention to conduct one’s self in an exemplary fashion in the future;
(f) restitution of funds or property, where applicable; and,
(g) positive action showing rehabilitation by occupation, religion, or community or civic service. Merely showing that an individual is now living as and doing those things he or she should have done throughout life, although necessary to prove rehabilitation, does not prove that the individual has undertaken a useful and constructive place in society. The requirement of positive action is appropriate for applicants for admission to The Florida Bar because service to one’s community is an implied obligation by members of The Florida Bar.
Florida Bar Defense Lawyer, Lars Soreide, is available to represent you at an investigative or formal character and fitness hearing before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners. Call 888-760-6552 for a free consultation or visit https://www.floridabarhearing.com.
https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2012-12-13 10:52:112012-12-13 10:52:11Elements of Rehabilitation in a Formal Hearing

Investigative Hearing Character and Fitness Considerations

December 13, 2012
 
If you must attend an investigative hearing before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners, the Board will consider your present character and fitness. This is codified in Florida Board of Bar Examiner Rule 3-12.
 
3-12 Determination of Present Character.
 
The board must determine whether the applicant or registrant has provided satisfactory evidence of good moral character. The following factors, among others, will be considered in assigning weight and significance to prior conduct:
(a) age at the time of the conduct;
(b) recency of the conduct;
(c) reliability of the information concerning the conduct;
(d) seriousness of the conduct;
(e) factors underlying the conduct;
(f) cumulative effect of the conduct or information;
(g) evidence of rehabilitation;
(h) positive social contributions since the conduct;
(i) candor in the admissions process; and,
(j) materiality of any omissions or misrepresentations.
Florida Bar Defense Lawyer, Lars Soreide, is available to represent you at an investigative or formal character and fitness hearing before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners. Call 888-760-6552 for a free consultation or visit our website at: https://www.floridabarhearing.com.
https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2012-12-13 10:36:212012-12-13 10:36:21Investigative Hearing Character and Fitness Considerations

Can I Still Get Admitted to the Florida Bar if I Have Had Past Drug, Alcohol, or Psychological Problems?

December 11, 2012
As a attorney who frequently represents applicants before the Florida Board of Bar Examiners in investigative and formal hearings, I see this issue a lot. I tell my clients that they can be admitted, in most instances conditionally, depending on all the surrounding circumstances. I point them first to rule 3-22.5(b) which relates to conditional admissions.
Under rule 3-22.5(b), Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Bar, the board will make the determination that a Consent Agreement be entered into with an applicant in lieu of the filing of Specifications pertaining to drug, alcohol, or psychological problems. Admission to The Florida Bar under the terms of a conditional admission is confidential and under rule 5-15, limited to persons who will live in Florida, who will be engaged in the practice of law primarily in Florida, and who will be monitored in Florida during the entire period of conditional admission.
The following comes directly off the Board of Bar Examiners website relating to conditional admissions.
Substance Issues
 
In a Consent Agreement, the board is authorized to recommend to the Court the admission of the applicant who has agreed to abide by specified terms and conditions on admission to The Florida Bar. The conditions will include:
  • prohibiting use of alcohol and controlled substances;
  • requiring participation in Florida Lawyers Assistance, Inc. (FLA); and,
  • random screenings for alcohol and controlled substances.
Board’s Guidelines on Documented Sobriety
 
Applicants who may be candidates for conditional admission must provide documentation of at least 6 months of sobriety before being considered for conditional admission. It is preferred that documentation of sobriety be completed by entering into a monitoring program that requires daily log-ins to determine if testing is required that day, attend attorney support meetings, attend AA/NA (if dependent), and undergo random alcohol/drug screenings. If an applicant resides within Florida, the preferred program is Florida Lawyers Assistance, Inc. (FLA). Any applicant attempting to provide documentation of sobriety through FLA or similar program must fully comply with the program contract, including strict adherence to the random drug test procedure, no missed daily log-ins, no missed or positive tests, and compliance with the meeting and monitoring requirements as outlined in the contract. In all unexcused cases where log-ins are missed, whether a test was required that day or not, the applicant must immediately make arrangements to be tested no later than the following day. Any missed test or failure to test after a missed log-in will be viewed by the board as a positive test. Documentation of the period of sobriety starts upon execution of a FLA or similar contract or the last date of noncompliance with the contract; whichever is most recent.
Acceptable Documentation of Sobriety
 
The board requires applicants to demonstrate a reasonable period of sobriety (abstinence) prior to conditional admission. Six months is presumed to be reasonable. Documentation of sobriety is made through verification of completion of a treatment program that includes random testing through records documenting compliance with a FLA contract.
To document a period of sobriety prior to admission:
  1. Contact FLA for assistance.
  2. Enter into a contract with FLA.
  3. Forward a copy of the FLA contract to the board.
  4. Arrange for FLA to provide monthly documentation to the board beginning immediately and continuing until all portions of the Florida Bar Examination are successfully completed.
  5. Full compliance with the FLA contract including strict adherence to the FLA random drug test procedure, no missed daily log-ins, no missed, or positive tests, and compliance with the meeting and monitoring requirements as outlined in the FLA contract. In all unexcused cases where log-ins are missed, whether a test was required that day or not, the applicant must immediately make arrangements to be tested no later than the following day. Any missed test or failure to test after a missed log-in will be viewed by the board as a positive test.
Missed Log-ins
 
The board, while working with FLA, established the following policy regarding excused log-ins. The only missed log-ins that will be excused are documented instances of the following:
  • Death in the family;
  • Admission of the participant, family member or significant other to the hospital or emergency room;
  • Victim of a natural disaster;
  • Arrested and in jail.
In all unexcused cases where log-ins are missed, whether a test was required that day or not, the applicant must immediately make arrangements to be tested no later than the following day. Any missed test or failure to test after a missed log-in will be viewed by the board as a positive test.
Length of Conditional Admission
 
The board’s policy on the length of conditional admission in substance abuse/dependence cases is a 1-5 year period, depending on individual circumstances.
Mental Health
 
The Florida Board of Bar Examiners must assess effectively the mental health of each applicant. A lawyer’s untreated or uncontrolled mental disorder, if severe, could result in injury to the public. The board assures each applicant that the Supreme Court, on the board’s recommendation, regularly admits applicants with a history of both mental ill-health and treatment by mental health professionals. The board considers satisfactory mental health to include: (1) the current absence of an untreated, uncontrolled mental illness that impairs or limits an applicant’s ability to practice law in a competent and professional manner; and (2) the unlikelihood of a relapse of such a prior mental illness. With respect to either, evidence of treatment by a mental health professional is useful. The board encourages applicants to seek the assistance of mental health professionals, if needed.
Consent Agreement
 
In a Consent Agreement, the board is authorized to recommend to the Supreme Court of Florida the admission of the applicant who has agreed to abide by specified terms and conditions on admission to The Florida Bar. The conditions will include:
  • consult with a licensed mental health provider at least quarterly, or more frequently as such mental health provider deems necessary;
  • follow all instructions by the mental health provider;
  • have the mental health provider submit quarterly reports to The Florida Bar during the entire probationary period;
  • have the mental health provider immediately notify The Florida Bar if the applicant misses a scheduled appointment without prior rescheduling; and,
  • have the mental health provider submit quarterly sworn statements to The Florida Bar during the entire probationary period attesting to the applicant’s compliance with the conditions.
Length of Conditional Admission
 
The board’s policy on the length of conditional admission in mental health cases is from 1 year to an indefinite period, depending on individual circumstances.
For more information contact License Defense Attorney, Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, to discuss what options are available to you if you are applying to the Florida Bar or have an investigative or formal hearing. Call 954-760-6552 or visit https://www.floridabarhearing.com.
https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2012-12-11 14:14:362012-12-11 14:14:36Can I Still Get Admitted to the Florida Bar if I Have Had Past Drug, Alcohol, or Psychological Problems?

THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES ATTORNEYS

June 5, 2012

The Florida Bar, the state’s guardian for the integrity of the legal profession, announced on their website that the Florida Supreme Court in recent court orders disciplined 22 attorneys in March, 21 attorneys in April, and 13 attorneys in May. Some attorneys received more than one form of discipline.

The Florida Bar and its Department of Lawyer Regulation, an official arm of the Florida Supreme Court, administer a statewide disciplinary system to enforce Supreme Court rules of professional conduct for the 93,000-plus lawyers admitted to practice law in Florida.

The Court’s orders are not final until time expires to file a rehearing motion and, if filed, determined. The filing of such a motion does not alter the effective date of the discipline. Disbarred lawyers may not re-apply for admission for five years.

Attorney Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents those seeking admittance to the Florida Bar, and existing lawyers, for both Investigative Hearings and Formal Hearings in front of the Florida Bar. For more information about our services please call (888) 760-6552 or visit: www.floridabarhearing.com.

https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2012-06-05 11:29:442012-06-05 11:29:44THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES ATTORNEYS

Can Undocumented Immigrant Be Accepted to Florida Bar?

April 16, 2012

In an April 15, 2012, article from South Florida’s Sun Sentinel, Rafael A. Olmeda writes that there is now a question of whether or not an immigrant without a green card get a Florida Bar card?

The aspiring lawyer, Jose Godinez-Samperio, 25, a Tampa-area resident, is hoping the answer is yes. A native of Mexico who entered the United States legally with his parents 16 years ago on a tourist visa, Godinez-Samperio is a graduate of the FSUCollege of Law, the valedictorian of the Armwood High School class of 2004, an Eagle Scout — and an undocumented immigrant. The last quality may keep him from achieving his dream.

Olmeda writes that the Florida Board of Bar Examiners, which grants membership to the Bar, has asked the state Supreme Court to determine whether it can accept someone who is not in the country legally. The Supreme Court flagged the case as “high profile” last week.

Tom Fitton, president of the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, said, “He can’t practice as a lawyer,” Fitton said. “He is not legally able to work in the United States. … It seems to me that it would be an absurdity to give him a Bar card at this point.”

The Sun Sentinel article adds that similar applications are pending for students in California and New York. But Godinez-Samperio, who once described himself as “undocumented, unapologetic and unafraid,” has influential allies who believe his immigration status should not keep him from getting a license to practice law, even though federal statutes would forbid him using that license to earn a living.

Godinez-Samperio has been candid about his status at every opportunity, disclosing it on college and law school applications (his application to law school included an essay titled “The Consequences of my Criminal Childhood,” although being in the country illegally is a civil infraction, not a crime).

Immigration advocates have lobbied Congress to pass the Development, Relief, and Education of Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, which would provide a path to citizenship for undocumented children who were brought to this country by their parents and raised in the United States. Congress has yet to pass such a law.

The Board of Bar Examiners began requiring exam-takers to submit proof of immigration status in 2008, but waived that policy for Godinez-Samperio, who disclosed his status and argued that documentation was not required as a rule for admission to the Bar.

There’s no way of knowing whether any undocumented immigrant was accepted before 2008, and Godinez-Samperio is the first to apply for membership since. Some have suggested Godinez-Samperio can practice law in Florida if he takes on cases pro-bono.

Olmeda concludes his article in saying that Godinez-Samperio, who declined to be interviewed for the Sun Sentinel article, also has the support of his local congresswoman. U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Tampa, wrote in a letter to the Supreme Court that taxpayers are already investing time and money by educating undocumented students during and after high school. “To deny these students the opportunity to become doctors or lawyers or practice another profession is to deny the state of Florida and all of our neighbors an educated and talented workforce,” she wrote.

Attorney Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents those seeking admittance to the Florida Bar, and existing lawyers, for both Investigative Hearings and Formal Hearings in front of the Florida Bar. For more information about our services please call (888) 760-6552 or visit: www.floridabarhearing.com.

https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2012-04-16 07:40:342012-04-16 07:40:34Can Undocumented Immigrant Be Accepted to Florida Bar?

FLORIDA’S SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES 31 ATTORNEYS IN JANUARY

February 9, 2012

The following information was obtained on The Florida Bar’s website:

The Florida Bar, the state’s guardian for the integrity of the legal profession, announces that the Florida Supreme Court in recent court orders disciplined 31 attorneys, disbarring 12 and suspending 15. Some attorneys received more than one form of discipline. One attorney was placed on probation; four attorneys were publicly reprimanded and two attorneys were ordered to pay restitution.

As an official arm of the Florida Supreme Court, The Florida Bar and its Department of Lawyer Regulation are charged with administering a statewide disciplinary system to enforce Supreme Court rules of professional conduct for the 93,000-plus lawyers admitted to practice law in Florida. Since Aug. 1, 2007, case files have been posted to attorneys’ individual Florida Bar profiles and may be reviewed at and/or downloaded from The Florida Bar’s website.

This ends the information obtained from The Florida Bar’s website.

Attorney Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents those seeking admittance to the Florida Bar, and existing lawyers, for both Investigative Hearings and Formal Hearings in front of the Florida Bar. For more information about our services please call call (888) 760-6552 or visit: www.floridabarhearing.com.

https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2012-02-09 12:10:042012-02-09 12:10:04FLORIDA’S SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES 31 ATTORNEYS IN JANUARY

The State of Florida’s SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES 12 ATTORNEYS

July 21, 2011

On The Florida Bar’s website, June 30th., 2011, that The Florida Bar, the state’s guardian for the integrity of the legal profession, announced the Florida Supreme Court in recent court orders disciplined 12 attorneys, disbarring four and suspending five. Some attorneys received more than one form of discipline. Three attorneys were placed on probation; three attorneys were publicly reprimanded.

The Florida Bar article goes on to say that as an official arm of the Florida Supreme Court, The Florida Bar and its Department of Lawyer Regulation are charged with administering a statewide disciplinary system to enforce Supreme Court rules of professional conduct for the 90,000-plus lawyers admitted to practice law in Florida. Since Aug. 1, 2007, case files have been posted to attorneys’ individual Florida Bar profiles and may be reviewed at and/or downloaded from The Florida Bar’s website.

Court orders are not final until time expires to file a rehearing motion and, if filed, determined. The filing of such a motion does not alter the effective date of the discipline. Disbarred lawyers may not re-apply for admission for five years. They are required to go through an extensive process that rejects many who apply. It includes a rigorous background check and retaking the bar exam. Historically, fewer than 5 percent of disbarred lawyers seek readmission.

This information was obtained on The Florid Bar’s website.

Attorney Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC,  represents those seeking admittance to the Florida Bar, and existing lawyers, for both investigative hearings and formal hearings in front of the Florida Bar. For more information about our services please visit: www.floridabarhearing.com , or call (888) 760-6552 to speak to an attorney.

https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2011-07-21 06:48:452011-07-21 06:48:45The State of Florida’s SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINES 12 ATTORNEYS

Law Schools Are Getting Practical

July 13, 2011

In a Wall Street Journal article by Patrick Lee, he writes that looking to attract employers’ attention, some law schools are throwing out decades of tradition by replacing textbook courses with classes that teach more practical skills.

Lee says that Indiana University Maurer School of Law started teaching project management this year and also offers a course on so-called emotional intelligence. The class has no textbook and instead uses personality assessments and peer reviews to develop students’ interpersonal skills.

Additionally, New York Law School hired 15 new faculty members over the past two years, many directly from the ranks of working lawyers, to teach skills in negotiation, counseling and fact investigation. The school says it normally hires one or two new faculty a year, and usually those focused on legal research.

A few elite players also are making adjustments. Harvard Law School last year launched a problem-solving class for first-year students, and Stanford Law School is considering making a full-time clinical course—which entails several 40-hour plus weeks of actual case work—a graduation requirement.

Washington and Lee University School of Law completely rebuilt its third-year curriculum in 2009, swapping out lectures and Socratic-style seminars for case-based simulations run by practicing lawyers.

“Law firms are saying, ‘You’re sending us peoplewho are not in a position to do anything useful for clients.’ This is a first effort to try and fix that,” says Larry Kramer, the law dean at Stanford.

LAWSCHOOLS

These moves come amid a prolonged downturn in the legal job market. Only about one-quarter of last year’s graduating law-school classes—down from 33% in 2009—snagged positions with big law firms, according to the National Association for Law Placement, an organization that collects employment data.

Lee goes on to say that in past years, a law firm could bill clients for a new lawyer’s work, even if that time were spent getting the novice up to speed. During the recession, corporate clients started limiting the number of hours a firm could charge and made it a policy not to pay for first-year associates.

“This is a push from clients saying, ‘Why are we going to pay this kind of money? We don’t want to train the new lawyers,'” says Jennifer Queen.

There are also fewer jobs to go around at a time when lawyers are in excess. In 2010, there were more than twice as many people—about 54,000—who passed the bar exam than there were legal job openings in the U.S., according to an analysis by consultants at Economic Modeling Specialists Inc.

Most law schools’ offerings cover a wide range of topics, but clinical placements—often students’ first chance for a taste of real law work—are usually optional and far fewer in number than theory-based courses.

“Medical students learn from real doctors in a real hospital during their education. In law, we’re learning from a bunch of academics who have deliberately elected not to pursue law as a profession…there’s such a disconnect,” says BeiBei Que, a 2007 graduate of the University of Illinois College of Law. Ms. Que, who runs a boutique law firm that helps tech start-ups navigate legal issues, says she had to pick up practical skills—networking, soliciting clients, forming a business plan—on her own.

Law schools have generally lagged behind other, more real-world oriented institutions like business schools in piloting practical improvements, as law professors tend to focus on scholarly work, says Bill Henderson, a professor at Maurer. And curriculum change tends to “move like a glacier,” he adds.

The WSJ article points out that many remain skeptical that new approaches to education will have a meaningful impact on the ability of lawyers to land jobs. “It could enhance the reputation of the law school…as places that will produce new lawyers who have practical skills,” says Timothy Lloyd, a partner at Hogan Lovells. “As to the particular student when I’m interviewing them? It doesn’t make much of a difference.”

Other recruiters say schools that have overhauled programs need to do a better job of promoting the changes to employers in order to see an impact.

Attorney Lars Soreide of Soreide Law Group, PLLC,  represents those seeking admittance to the Florida Bar, and existing lawyers, for both investigative hearings and formal hearings in front of the Florida Bar. For more information about our services please visit: www.floridabarhearing.com or call (888) 760-6552.

https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png 0 0 Editor https://www.floridabarhearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/soreide-logo-300x183.png Editor2011-07-13 08:25:242011-07-13 08:25:24Law Schools Are Getting Practical
Search Search

Recent Posts

  • FLORIDA BAR HEARING DATES for 2026
  • Florida Bar Hearing Dates for 2025
  • 2024 Dates for Florida Bar Hearings
  • Applicants Before Florida Bar Examiners Should Write a Brief
  • Florida Bar Hearings 2023

Archives

  • October 2025
  • October 2024
  • October 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • March 2022
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • March 2021
  • December 2019
  • September 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • September 2018
  • March 2018
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010

Business Hours

  • Monday-Friday: 9am to 5pm
  • Saturday: 10am to 2pm
  • Sunday: Closed

Our phone numbers are available 24hs for any consultation you may have.

Contact Us

2401 E. Atlantic Blvd
Suite 305
Pompano Beach, FL 33062
Toll Free: (888) 760-6552
Local: (954) 760-6552
Fax: (954) 760-6553
Email: [email protected]

About Us

We Represent Florida Bar Attorneys and Florida Bar Applicants Before The Florida Bar Grievance Committee and the Florida Board of Bar Examiners

Where you can find us

Copyright © 2022, SOREIDE LAW GROUP PLLC
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to LinkedIn
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top